<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.1 Already Faster than Firefox 3.0.x</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenmtngeek.com/2008/08/firefox-31-already-faster-than-firefox-30x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenmtngeek.com/2008/08/firefox-31-already-faster-than-firefox-30x/</link>
	<description>A place to vent my technical spleen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:33:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk M</title>
		<link>http://www.greenmtngeek.com/2008/08/firefox-31-already-faster-than-firefox-30x/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenmtngeek.com/2008/08/firefox-31-already-faster-than-firefox-30x/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Vladimir, (Welcome!)

I really didn&#039;t see any difference in loading times with the trunk builds but I&#039;m waiting until they get most of the bugs out of &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;TraceMonkey test results&quot; href=&quot;http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roadmap/archives/2008/08/tracemonkey_javascript_lightsp.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TraceMonkey&lt;/a&gt; (replaces the current SpiderMonkey Java script engine for Firefox) which, I believe, is still turned off by default at the moment, to see if it makes any difference in Firefox loading times. The link above takes you to some initial tests made with TraceMonkey turned on. Strangely enough, when I tried the SunSpider test myself, the current nightly build (at the time) crashed and burned. I&#039;ll try it again sometime and see if I have any better luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vladimir, (Welcome!)</p>
<p>I really didn&#8217;t see any difference in loading times with the trunk builds but I&#8217;m waiting until they get most of the bugs out of <a target="_blank" title="TraceMonkey test results" href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roadmap/archives/2008/08/tracemonkey_javascript_lightsp.html" rel="nofollow">TraceMonkey</a> (replaces the current SpiderMonkey Java script engine for Firefox) which, I believe, is still turned off by default at the moment, to see if it makes any difference in Firefox loading times. The link above takes you to some initial tests made with TraceMonkey turned on. Strangely enough, when I tried the SunSpider test myself, the current nightly build (at the time) crashed and burned. I&#8217;ll try it again sometime and see if I have any better luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir</title>
		<link>http://www.greenmtngeek.com/2008/08/firefox-31-already-faster-than-firefox-30x/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenmtngeek.com/2008/08/firefox-31-already-faster-than-firefox-30x/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Did you notice any improvements in loading time?

Chrome loads instantly, something for the Mozilla team to look up to!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice any improvements in loading time?</p>
<p>Chrome loads instantly, something for the Mozilla team to look up to!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
